Built from lived experience inside the system, Incarcerated Advocacy Research provides clear, evidence-based guidance for high-stakes moments — hearings, reentry, and every step of rebuilding a life.
Karl Tobey knows what it means to face the legal system with everything on the line and almost nothing in your corner. He learned the law from the inside — studying, researching, and building the legal literacy that most people never get the chance to develop, even when they need it most.
“This business grew out of real loss and a real fight for freedom. I built Incarcerated Advocacy Research so people aren’t forced to face those barriers alone.”
After earning his Associate of Arts in Paralegal Studies from Edmonds Community College, Karl channeled that knowledge into nonprofit leadership — serving as a 7-year Executive Board Member of Cares of Washington, focused on employment and self-sufficiency for low-income and disabled individuals. He has also published advocacy writing in newspapers and on LinkedIn.
Incarcerated Advocacy Research exists because second chances are real, but they require preparation, structure, and someone who has walked a similar road and is willing to show you the way forward.
Connect With Karl ↗Incarcerated Advocacy Research focuses on the moments that matter most — when the stakes are high, the timeline is tight, and clarity can change everything.
Evidence-based workbooks for the highest-stakes moments — ISRB .420 hearing preparation and challenging conditions of release. Written in plain language, grounded in WA law.
Combine the .420 Hearing Guide with 60 minutes of one-on-one consultation time. Walk through your specific situation, timeline, and strategy together.
Process service that is accessible to justice-impacted clientsβclear communication, documented attempts, and proof of service so you can meet deadlines and keep your case moving--in Pierce, King, and Snohomish Counties.
Edit, reorganize, and draft from your existing documents. Not legal practice — clear, structured help getting your paperwork in order before it matters most.
Incarcerated access research support powered by AI tools. Get targeted research on your specific situation — statute lookups, case law summaries, and more. Up to 5 pages results per search.
An AI civic advocacy tool in development — tracking WA State bills in real time, generating plain-language summaries, drafting letters to legislators, and helping individuals engage at the right moment.
Every guide is written in plain language, grounded in Washington State law and policy, and built for the person in the middle of it — not just their attorney.
The most comprehensive preparation guide available for individuals facing an Indeterminate Sentence Review Board .420 hearing in Washington State. Built for the person in the room — not just their legal team.
A workbook for people on community custody in Washington State who need to understand, sort, and challenge their release conditions — from the court, DOC, and the ISRB. Includes real statutes, recent appellate decisions, templates, and plain-language explanations for pro se use.
A practical, Washington State-specific guide covering preparation for requesting relief from requirements.
A plain-language guide to navigating the internal grievance and kite system inside Washington State DOC facilities — documenting issues, tracking responses, and building a record that matters.
A resource for families, friends, and community advocates navigating the DOC system alongside a loved one.
There is a difference between reading about a system and living inside it. That difference shapes everything about the quality of guidance you receive.
When someone has been through what you’re facing, you know they’re not guessing. Lived experience creates a level of trust that credentials alone can’t provide.
Understanding how systems actually operate — not just how they’re supposed to — comes from experience. That insight shapes every guide, every recommendation, every word of advice.
Paralegal training and lived experience together create something rare: guidance that is both technically grounded and deeply human. That’s the foundation of Incarcerated Advocacy Research.
There is no shame here. No judgment. Only forward movement. Every person deserves clear guidance for high-stakes moments, regardless of their past.
Second chances are not just a phrase. They are the result of preparation, clarity, and someone who believes in your ability to move forward — even when the system makes that hard.
Real responses from legal professionals, advocates, and those who have used Incarcerated Advocacy Research resources.
I am impressed with the breadth and scope of this piece… This Guide is invaluable advice for anyone facing this hearing, regardless of what they say about their individual offense.
When you’re facing one of the most important hearings of your life, having a structured, clear guide makes the difference between walking in prepared and walking in afraid. Incarcerated Advocacy Research delivers exactly that.
As a family member trying to understand what my loved one was facing, this resource gave me clarity I couldn’t find anywhere else. Karl’s guidance is grounded, compassionate, and real.
Purchase securely through Square. All major cards accepted. After purchase, your guide will be delivered to your email within one business day.
Guides are delivered digitally by email within 1 business day. Nonprofits and reentry organizations may contact Karl about reduced-rate access for indigent individuals. All purchases support continued advocacy work.
Incarcerated Advocacy Research is not just a service — it is a commitment to systemic change. Guided by the belief that a better system is possible, this work extends beyond individual cases into policy, education, and community advocacy.
Working alongside reform advocates to support second chance legislation in Washington State and beyond.
Creating accessible materials that help communities understand sentencing, reentry, and civic restoration.
Reducing barriers for people with conviction histories to fully participate in civic and community life.
Evidence-based policy writing grounded in real experience, WSIPP data, and Washington State law.
Washington State and federal law provide real, enforceable protections for people with conviction records. Understanding these laws is the first step to using them.
Current law: Employers with 8 or more employees cannot ask about criminal history on a job application or before determining you are otherwise qualified for a position.
Effective July 1, 2026 (15+ employees) & Jan 1, 2027 (all employers): Significant amendments under HB 1747 strengthen these protections. Employers may not inquire about criminal history until after a conditional job offer. Adverse action based on arrest records or juvenile convictions is prohibited entirely (except for adults out on bail awaiting trial). For adult conviction records, employers must: identify the specific record in writing, allow a minimum of two business days to respond or present rehabilitation evidence, and issue a final written decision documenting their reasoning.
A public employer in Washington State may only deny employment based on a prior felony conviction when both conditions are met: (1) the felony directly relates to the specific position sought, and (2) the conviction occurred less than 10 years ago. If either condition is not met, the employer has no statutory authorization to deny based on that conviction.
Convictions older than 10 years fall outside the employer's authorization to deny β this is not "heightened scrutiny" where they must work harder to justify a denial; it is a near-bar on denial entirely. Limited exceptions exist for county treasurer positions (embezzlement or theft, no time limit) and school district positions requiring unsupervised access to children (specific felonies, no time limit).
Applies to employers with one or more employees operating within Seattle city limits, including staffing agencies. Criminal history may not appear on job applications. Employers cannot inquire about conviction or arrest records until after an initial screening has eliminated unqualified applicants. Job postings may not contain categorical exclusions such as "felons need not apply." Before any adverse decision, employers must conduct an individualized assessment and give the applicant an opportunity to explain or correct the record, including presenting evidence of rehabilitation.*
Enforced by Seattle's Office of Labor Standards: (206) 256-5297.
If an employer uses a third-party consumer reporting agency to run a background check, federal law requires: (1) your written authorization before the check is run; (2) a pre-adverse action notice β including a copy of the report and your Summary of Rights β before any denial; and (3) a reasonable period for you to dispute inaccuracies before a final adverse action is issued. You have the right to dispute and correct errors directly with the reporting agency at no cost.
Washington's anti-discrimination law prohibits employment policies that have a disproportionate impact on protected classes β including race and national origin β without a legitimate business justification. Blanket criminal history bans that disproportionately screen out protected groups may be unlawful under RCW 49.60, even if each individual denial appears neutral on its face. This provides an important additional avenue of challenge beyond the Fair Chance Act.
When you complete all sentence conditions, the court must issue a Certificate of Discharge under RCW 9.94A.637, restoring civil rights including the right to vote and serve on a jury. Separately, RCW 9.94A.640 allows individuals who have been discharged to petition the court to vacate their felony conviction record. If granted, you may legally state the conviction never occurred on employment applications β and state agencies may not disclose the vacated record to most third parties. For misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor vacations, see RCW 9.96.060. Waiting periods and eligibility requirements apply based on offense class.
Seattle's Fair Chance Employment Ordinance does not apply to: (1) the U.S. federal government; the State of Washington including its legislature, judiciary, public universities (e.g., UW, WSU), and other state agencies; or any county or local government other than the City of Seattle β note: state employers remain covered by RCW 9.96A.020, so applicants to those institutions retain state-law protections; (2) positions involving unsupervised access to children under 16, individuals with developmental disabilities, or other vulnerable adults; (3) positions where an employer is required or permitted by federal or state law to inquire about and consider criminal history (e.g., financial institutions, certain healthcare and licensed care roles); (4) non-employee volunteer positions.
You have procedural rights at each stage. Act on them β and document everything.
Request the adverse action notice in writing. Under RCW 49.94 and FCRA, you are legally entitled to written notice before and after a denial based on your background.
Obtain a copy of your background report. You have 60 days from receiving a denial to request a free copy of the consumer report used against you.
Dispute inaccuracies immediately. Contact the consumer reporting agency directly. They are required to investigate disputes within 30 days and correct or remove inaccurate information.
File a complaint if your rights were violated. Contact the appropriate enforcement agency based on where the violation occurred β see resources below.
These are the questions we hear most often. If something isn’t answered here, reach out directly — there’s no wrong way to start.
No. Incarcerated Advocacy Research is a paralegal services and legal education business founded by Karl Tobey, who holds an Associate of Arts in Paralegal Studies from Edmonds Community College. Karl is not a licensed attorney and does not provide legal representation of any kind.
Legal advice means a licensed attorney applying the law to your specific facts to guide your decisions — and taking professional responsibility for that guidance. Legal information means explaining what the law says, how a process works, and what options exist. Incarcerated Advocacy Research provides the latter. The guides, research credits, document assistance, and consultations offered here are educational resources and procedural support — not legal advice.
No — and anyone who tells you otherwise, licensed or not, should raise a red flag. What Karl can do is help you understand the process, prepare your documentation, and walk into that room with clarity instead of confusion. That preparation matters. It is just not a legal prediction or a legal opinion.
A consultation is scoped to hearing preparation, procedural understanding, and document organization. Karl will help you understand how the process works, review the materials you have, and help you structure your preparation. He will not tell you what legal strategy to pursue or evaluate your legal rights as an attorney would. Think of it as a structured preparation session with someone who has been through the system and studied it formally — not a legal strategy meeting.
Yes — and Incarcerated Advocacy Research is designed to work alongside legal representation, not replace it. The ISRB .420 Hearing Workbook has been reviewed and endorsed by trial attorney Brad Meryhew precisely because it complements what attorneys do. If you do not have an attorney, Karl can help you understand your options and point you toward appropriate resources.
Yes. Washington’s unauthorized practice of law statute, RCW 2.48.180, governs what requires a law license. Providing legal education, plain-language guides grounded in public statutes and case law, document processing support, and procedural preparation assistance does not constitute the practice of law. Incarcerated Advocacy Research’s services are structured specifically with those boundaries in mind.
Throughout the website, in every guide, and in all written communications: “Incarcerated Advocacy Research provides paralegal assistance and educational resources — not legal advice. For legal representation, always consult a licensed attorney.”
That is not fine print. It is the foundation of how this business operates.
Whether you’re preparing for a hearing, navigating reentry, supporting a loved one, or seeking collaboration on advocacy work — reach out. You don’t have to figure this out alone.
A note: Incarcerated Advocacy Research provides paralegal assistance and educational resources — not legal advice. For legal representation, always consult a licensed attorney.